- Employees can contribute to workplace toxicity through gossip, bullying, dishonesty and destructive competition.
- Leadership determines whether such behaviour is confronted, contained or allowed to become organisational culture.
- Healthy workplaces require fair accountability, credible systems, professional conduct and leaders who model expected behaviour.
When employees dread Monday mornings, avoid certain colleagues, stop speaking honestly in meetings and spend more energy navigating office politics than doing their jobs, an organisation has a problem bigger than poor morale. It may have a workplace culture problem.
A toxic workplace is not always created by bad leadership. Employees can contribute through gossip, bullying, dishonesty, poor teamwork, unhealthy competition or deliberate resistance to colleagues and management.
But there is an important distinction: employees may create individual problems; leadership determines whether those problems are confronted, contained or allowed to become the culture.
That is why persistent workplace toxicity deserves serious scrutiny of management.
When gossip becomes routine, departments work in silos, favouritism goes unchallenged, accountability becomes selective and employees learn that speaking honestly is risky, the problem has moved beyond individual behaviour. It has become an organisational problem.
What leaders repeatedly tolerate becomes part of the culture. What they ignore can become an unwritten rule. What they reward, deliberately or inadvertently, employees learn to reproduce.
Yet leadership cannot be blamed for every difficult employee or interpersonal disagreement. Workplaces bring together people with different personalities, ambitions, experiences and expectations. Conflict is inevitable.
The real test is what happens next.
Leadership determines whether problems spread
A competent manager establishes clear standards, communicates expectations, addresses misconduct, resolves disputes and applies rules fairly. Employees, meanwhile, must take responsibility for their own conduct, accept legitimate feedback and raise concerns through appropriate channels.
The question is not simply who created the problem. It is whether those with responsibility are willing and able to resolve it.
This becomes particularly important when unhealthy behaviour is allowed to spread.
Gossip, for example, is primarily a matter of individual responsibility. Employees who deliberately spread damaging rumours should be held accountable. But poor communication can create an information vacuum in which speculation flourishes.
Management therefore has a duty to communicate important decisions clearly and provide reliable information. Employees have an equal duty to avoid turning uncertainty into destructive rumours.
The same principle applies to competition.
Competition can drive excellence, innovation and productivity. It becomes toxic when employees begin treating colleagues as threats rather than teammates.
Leaders influence this balance through the way they structure targets, recognise performance and reward behaviour. An organisation that celebrates individual achievement while ignoring teamwork may unintentionally encourage employees to compete at the expense of collaboration.
The answer is not to eliminate ambition. It is to ensure that individual success does not come at the cost of organisational success.
Sometimes the problem is the system
Sometimes, however, what looks like a people problem is actually a systems problem.
Unclear responsibilities can create conflict. Excessive workloads can fuel frustration. Understaffing can produce burnout. Poorly designed targets can encourage unhealthy competition. Weak grievance mechanisms can leave employees feeling ignored.
These problems cannot be solved simply by telling people to “work together.”
Leaders must examine whether organisational structures are contributing to the tension.
If several employees complain about the same process, investigate the process. If departments repeatedly clash over responsibilities, review how those responsibilities are defined. If people consistently leave one department, examine its management and working conditions.
Similarly, repeated complaints about a manager should neither automatically be accepted nor dismissed as employee rebellion. They should be investigated fairly, with evidence and an opportunity for all sides to be heard.
Good leadership listens without automatically taking sides.
A healthy workplace also requires room for disagreement.
Employees should be able to question decisions, challenge ideas and offer alternative views without being labelled disloyal. But disagreement must remain professional. Speaking openly does not give anyone permission to insult, intimidate, bully or sabotage colleagues.
The objective is not to create a workplace without conflict. It is to prevent normal conflict from becoming destructive conflict.
That requires managers who can have difficult conversations, provide constructive feedback, mediate disputes and make fair decisions.
It also requires employees who can receive criticism, acknowledge mistakes and resolve disagreements professionally.
Accountability must work both ways
Accountability must apply in both directions.
Managers should answer for abuse of authority, unfair treatment, poor leadership and failure to address serious problems. Employees should answer for misconduct, bullying, dishonesty, persistent underperformance and behaviour that damages colleagues or the organisation.
Accountability loses credibility when it applies only to junior employees. It also becomes unfair when managers are blamed for every employee’s personal choices.
This is why workplace culture is ultimately a shared responsibility, although leaders carry greater institutional responsibility because they control many of the systems through which culture is reinforced.
Organisations seeking healthier workplaces should therefore go beyond motivational slogans and policies on office walls.
Managers need training in communication, conflict resolution, emotional intelligence, coaching, performance management and ethical leadership. Employees need clear standards of professional conduct. Grievance systems must be credible. Performance expectations must be realistic. Rules must be applied consistently.
Most importantly, leaders must model the behaviour they expect from others.
A manager cannot demand respect while treating employees disrespectfully. They cannot preach teamwork while rewarding destructive competition. They cannot demand transparency while withholding information without explanation.
Leadership behaviour is often more powerful than any policy document.
At the same time, employees must recognise that workplace culture is not something management creates alone. Every conversation, decision and interaction either strengthens or weakens the environment.
A worker who refuses to gossip, treats colleagues with respect, raises concerns constructively and accepts accountability contributes to a healthier workplace.
So does a manager who listens, communicates clearly and acts fairly.
Healthy culture is built through repeated behaviour, not occasional speeches.
A strong organisation is therefore not one where everyone agrees. It is one where people can disagree without destroying relationships, compete without becoming enemies, raise concerns without fear and accept accountability without humiliation.
The goal is not perfection. It is professionalism.
Toxicity may have many causes, but once it becomes entrenched, ignoring it becomes a leadership problem.
That is why organisations should resist the temptation to find one convenient person to blame. Instead, they should examine behaviour, leadership, systems and working conditions together.
Ask what is happening. Establish the facts. Listen to different perspectives. Correct misconduct. Fix dysfunctional systems. Hold people accountable regardless of their position.
A toxic workplace may not be created by one person. But it becomes a culture when too many people—and especially those with authority—allow it to continue.
The real measure of leadership is therefore not whether problems exist.
They will.
The measure is whether leaders and employees have the courage, competence and accountability to confront them before they become the organisation’s normal way of doing business.
Good workplaces are not built by perfect people. They are built by people who understand that their behaviour matters—and by leaders who have the courage to ensure that it does.
READ ALSO: KNEC reopens CBA portal for schools to correct missing KPSEA, KJSEA scores
Employees interact in an office environment where leadership, communication, teamwork and accountability shape workplace culture.
By Hillary Muhalya
Get more stories from our website: Education News
To write to us or offer feedback, you can reach us at: editor@educationnews.co.ke
You can also follow our social media pages on Twitter: Education News KE and Facebook: Education News Newspaper for timely updates.
>> Click here to stay up-to-date with trending regional stories
