When to lead and when to boss: The secret every school manager should know

In schools, titles alone do not make leaders. Anyone can hold the designation of principal, headteacher, or director, yet leadership is not guaranteed by the letters after one’s name. True leadership is forged in character, cultivated in experience, and tested daily in the unpredictable rhythms of school life.

Over decades in education, it becomes clear that trying to be a full-time leader or a full-time boss rarely serves a school well. Why? Because not every situation in a school responds to the same approach. Some moments demand patience, empathy, and guidance; others require decisiveness, firmness, and authority. The secret every school leader must understand is knowing when to lead and when to boss, and how to switch seamlessly between the two.

Leadership in a school context is about more than issuing instructions or following protocol. It is about guiding, inspiring, and building trust. A leader listens more than they speak, coaches rather than punishes, and mentors both teachers and students. They invest in creating a culture of collaboration, respect, and professionalism that permeates every corner of the school.

Leadership is about vision, consistency, and the ability to foster commitment not through fear or enforcement but through mutual respect. A school led with this approach produces not only students who achieve academically but teachers who feel valued, motivated, and part of something larger than themselves. Leadership, when done well, leaves a lasting legacy.

Bossing, by contrast, is about enforcing rules and ensuring compliance. It is the act of setting boundaries and making certain that they are respected. While leadership builds trust, bossing protects order. A boss acts swiftly when rules are broken, maintains boundaries without negotiation, and safeguards the school’s policies, vision, and safety. Bossing is decisive, direct, and often uncomfortably firm. Its purpose is not to inspire affection or admiration but to ensure that the school functions effectively and that safety, standards, and discipline are maintained. Without bossing, schools risk chaos; policies remain theoretical, and boundaries are ignored.

The challenge arises when leaders attempt to rely entirely on one approach. A school run exclusively by a leader may feel soft. Rules can be ignored, boundaries tested, and discipline inconsistently enforced. Teachers and students may push limits, assuming that flexibility will always prevail. Children notice these inconsistencies, and respect, once earned, begins to erode. On the other hand, a school run entirely by a boss may maintain order, but at the cost of morale and engagement. Teachers feel micromanaged, creativity is stifled, and the system appears cold and inflexible to both parents and students. Compliance may exist, but genuine commitment does not. The ideal school strikes a balance: it blends leadership and bossing intentionally, applying each in the right measure at the right time.

ALSO READ:

Senate raises alarm over proposed merger of ECDE, primary teacher training

In everyday school life, a leader should be the default role. Mentoring staff and students, listening to feedback, encouraging innovation, and modeling professional behavior all build trust and engagement. Leadership in these contexts creates a sense of purpose and fosters a collaborative culture. For example, when a teacher struggles with classroom management, a leader takes the time to understand the challenge, offers guidance, and provides strategies for improvement. When students face difficulties—academic, social, or emotional—a leader listens, offers support, and empowers them to find solutions. Leadership is about cultivating growth, commitment, and a shared vision.

However, there are moments when the leader must step aside and the boss must take charge. Firmness becomes essential when boundaries are crossed, when rules are repeatedly broken, or when the safety and wellbeing of students are at risk. Serious misconduct by staff or students, threats to school property, and crises requiring quick, decisive action all demand bossing. Being firm does not mean abandoning empathy; rather, it means protecting the school community, maintaining standards, and communicating consequences clearly and consistently. In these moments, the authority of the principal or headteacher is not optional—it is necessary to preserve order and ensure fairness.

Situational leadership—the ability to read the environment and adjust one’s approach—is at the heart of effective school management. Leaders must continually ask themselves: “Does this situation require guidance, or does it require enforcement?” The answer dictates whether to lead or to boss. Lead when staff and students need direction, encouragement, or support. Boss when rules have been broken, standards are threatened, or quick decisions are essential. The most effective school leaders do not abandon authority; they apply it judiciously, choosing the right tone for each moment.

Consider the example of a staff meeting where a teacher raises concerns about curriculum changes. A purely boss-like approach might dismiss the feedback or enforce compliance without discussion, creating resentment. A purely leader-like approach might encourage dialogue but fail to implement necessary decisions, leaving staff confused and policies unenforced. A situational leader listens, validates concerns, provides guidance, and then clearly communicates the decision, ensuring understanding while maintaining authority. This approach fosters both trust and compliance.

Similarly, in the classroom, when a student repeatedly disrupts lessons, a leader may initially seek to understand underlying causes, offer mentorship, or involve counseling. However, if behavior persists and threatens the learning of others, bossing becomes necessary. Clear consequences, consistent enforcement, and firm boundaries protect not only the teacher’s authority but also the learning environment for all students. Situational leadership is not about choosing one approach over the other—it is about blending them with intention, skill, and timing.

ALSO READ:

PLO Lumumba challenges students to be agents of peace, lead with integrity

Effective school leaders also recognize that the balance between leading and bossing is dynamic. Every school, every class, and every individual may require a different approach at different times. Leadership is not passive; it is active engagement with people, policies, and culture. Bossing is not authoritarianism; it is decisive action to maintain standards, fairness, and safety. By consciously navigating between these roles, leaders model professionalism, inspire commitment, and uphold the integrity of the school system.

The consequences of failing to balance these roles are significant. Schools led exclusively with a soft approach risk losing discipline, authority, and respect. Schools led exclusively with a rigid, boss-like approach risk demoralizing staff, stifling creativity, and fostering resentment. Students are perceptive—they notice when authority is inconsistent, when rules are applied unevenly, or when adults are unapproachable. Teachers also observe how leaders navigate these roles; their engagement, motivation, and loyalty are influenced by the balance of empathy and authority they experience from leadership.

The ideal school leader blends leadership and bossing intentionally, knowing when each approach is necessary. Lead with empathy to inspire growth, collaboration, and innovation. Boss with clarity to enforce rules, protect safety, and maintain order. The switch between these roles should be seamless, informed by situational awareness and grounded in the school’s mission and values. Leaders who master this balance create environments where trust, respect, and order coexist, and where both staff and students flourish.

In practical terms, this requires a daily mindfulness about one’s role and its impact. It requires reflection: asking what each situation demands, anticipating challenges, and planning responses that honor both the human and institutional dimensions of education. It requires courage—the courage to listen, to guide, and to intervene decisively when necessary. Above all, it requires consistency, fairness, and integrity.

ALSO READ:

KUPPET Bomet aspirant urges parents to avoid blaming teachers over poor KCSE results

A perfect school leader is neither all soft nor all hard. They are wise, intentional, and adaptable. They lead with empathy and boss with clarity, choosing the right moment, tone, and approach for every challenge. This skill is developed over years of experience, reflection, and learning from both successes and failures. When mastered, it transforms a school from a place of rules and fear into a community of culture, excellence, and enduring achievement.

Leadership in schools is not about personality or position; it is about the ability to discern the needs of the moment, to respond with intention, and to guide the school toward its highest potential. A leader’s greatest impact comes not from issuing orders or issuing praise alone, but from knowing when to lead and when to boss, and from doing so with consistency, integrity, and vision.

When this balance is achieved, schools thrive. Teachers feel supported yet accountable. Students feel guided yet disciplined. Parents see a system that is both fair and flexible. And the community witnesses a school that is more than bricks and mortar—it is a culture of respect, learning, and excellence.

Mastering the art of leading and bossing is not optional for school leaders; it is essential. The ability to switch seamlessly between guidance and enforcement, between mentorship and discipline, defines the difference between a school that merely survives and a school that truly excels. Leaders who understand this secret build not only institutions but legacies.

A perfect school leader is intentional, adaptable, and wise. They lead with empathy, boss with clarity, and switch seamlessly between the two. When this balance is achieved, trust, respect, and order coexist, and schools grow beyond rules and fear into environments of culture, excellence, and lasting impact.

By Hillary Muhalya