TPAD Term One 2026: The observable changes teachers, heads must notice

Term One of 2026 has come with noticeable and practical changes in the way the Teachers Service Commission (TSC) expects teachers and school administrators to handle Teacher Performance Appraisal and Development (TPAD). While TPAD has always been a routine professional requirement, the new adjustments make it clearer that TSC is now pushing for greater accuracy, stricter accountability, and a more detailed reflection of what happens in real classroom practice.

To begin with, the most immediate and visible change is that TPAD for Term One 2026 has been activated, meaning teachers are expected to log in early, create their term appraisal, and begin working through the process in line with the official TPAD calendar. This activation is not just a formality. It signals that the Commission expects schools to treat the appraisal cycle as an ongoing activity throughout the term rather than something rushed at the end. Heads of institutions, on the other hand, are also required to complete and submit their performance contracts within the set timelines, reinforcing the fact that accountability is not only for classroom teachers but also for school leadership.

One of the most outstanding changes teachers are observing in Term One 2026 is the shift towards more detailed scoring based on specific learning areas or subjects. Previously, many teachers could give a general performance rating for their teaching load. However, the new requirement is pushing teachers to break down their performance scores according to the specific areas they teach.

For example, teachers handling broad learning areas such as Creative Arts and Sports may now be required to score and account for individual components such as Music, Art and Craft, and Physical Education separately. This change may appear small on the surface, but it carries a major implication: TPAD is now being refined to ensure that a teacher’s performance is assessed with greater fairness and accuracy, leaving less room for vague generalisations.

ALSO READ:

CDE Mulili: Nakuru Senior Schools have admitted 85% Grade 10 learners

Another key observation is that the current TPAD cycle is increasingly being influenced by the expected transition to TPAD 3, even though the new system is not yet fully rolled out. Teachers are already noticing that communication from TSC and supervisory expectations are beginning to reflect a more streamlined appraisal framework.

Under the planned TPAD 3 direction, teaching standards are expected to be reduced and reorganised in a way that focuses more sharply on effective curriculum delivery, learner-centred classroom environments, integration of technology in learning, and professional growth of the teacher. Even before full implementation, these ideas are already shaping how teachers are guided to interpret performance targets and evidence in 2026.

Closely tied to this shift is the growing emphasis on teacher growth and professional development as a serious appraisal component. Term One 2026 continues to show that professional development is no longer optional or treated as a side activity. Teachers are expected to participate in professional development programmes and complete required modules as part of their annual performance expectations.

The direction being communicated is that teachers may be required to complete two professional development modules per year, including one funded by the employer and another self-sponsored.This approach sends a clear message that TSC wants professional development to become part of the teacher’s culture, and not merely a requirement for promotion interviews.

Equally important is the observable tightening of compliance measures. In the past, many teachers could delay appraisals and still manage to submit them late without immediate consequences. Term One 2026 is showing a different attitude from TSC. There is a stronger warning tone on incomplete or late submissions, and the message is clear: teachers must complete their appraisals on time and ensure they are acknowledged by supervisors.

The Commission has indicated that failure to complete TPAD may attract serious consequences, including missing out on promotion opportunities and possibly facing administrative action. This has created a new level of seriousness, especially among teachers who previously treated TPAD as a routine formality.

ALSO READ:

Do our leaders watch news to see the cries of Kenyan parents?

Beyond compliance, teachers are also noticing that TPAD is increasingly becoming a tool that directly influences career progression. While promotions depend on many factors, TPAD performance continues to be a major consideration. The emerging practice is that a teacher’s average TPAD rating over a period of years can contribute to promotion scoring, meaning that consistent performance is now being rewarded more than last-minute efforts.

This change encourages teachers to maintain professional discipline and consistency across terms, rather than waiting for the year of promotion to “work hard.” In this sense, TPAD is gradually shifting from being viewed as paperwork to being seen as a long-term professional record that can either open doors or close them.

In summary, TPAD Term One 2026 is marked by activation and early engagement, more detailed and subject-specific scoring, clear signals of the coming TPAD 3 framework, stronger integration of professional development, and tighter enforcement of timelines and accountability. These changes point to one clear direction: TSC is strengthening TPAD to make it more realistic, measurable, and impactful in both teaching quality and career growth. Teachers and school heads who adapt early, keep evidence throughout the term, and treat appraisal as professional discipline rather than a rushed duty will find the process smoother and more rewarding.

By Hillary Muhalya