Education is the foundation of any nation’s progress, yet in Kenya, the very tools meant to shape learners’ futures—textbooks, reference materials, and practical guides—often arrive late, in inadequate quantities, or fail to meet the specific needs of individual schools.
For decades, centralized procurement by the Ministry of Education has been the norm, driven by a desire to standardize and streamline distribution. While well-intentioned, this system has repeatedly fallen short, creating bottlenecks, delays, and mismatches between learners’ needs and the resources they receive. The time has come to empower heads of institutions to source books directly. This is not just a matter of administrative convenience—it is a strategic move that will improve learning outcomes, promote accountability, and make education responsive to local realities.
School heads are uniquely positioned to make procurement decisions that directly impact teaching and learning. They interact daily with teachers and learners, observing both strengths and gaps. Centralized procurement, by contrast, operates far from the realities of the classroom and cannot capture the diversity of learner needs, school profiles, or subject emphasis.
A rural school focusing on agriculture, environmental science, or hands-on practical skills may require specialized guides and manuals, whereas urban schools might need advanced reference books in mathematics, science, or technology. Heads of institutions are best placed to identify the resources that are not only relevant but also timely, appropriate, and tailored to their learners’ abilities.
Timeliness is crucial in education. Centralized procurement is often mired in bureaucracy, leaving schools waiting months for essential materials. By the time books finally arrive, the syllabus may have moved ahead, lessons may have been delayed, and learners may have fallen behind. Allowing heads to source books directly ensures that learning is uninterrupted.
Principals can act quickly, identify reliable suppliers, inspect sample materials, and deliver books to students when they are most needed. This immediacy can make the difference between learners understanding concepts on time or struggling to catch up, ultimately affecting exam performance, learner confidence, and progression.
Quality control is another area where decentralization shines. Bulk procurement often emphasizes quantity over quality. Ministries, constrained by budgets and logistics, may supply materials that are outdated, poorly printed, or irrelevant to the school’s specific curriculum implementation. Heads of institutions can inspect, compare, and select textbooks and supplementary materials that meet high standards. They ensure that the content is accurate, relevant, age-appropriate, and aligned with the learners’ level of understanding. When quality is prioritized, learners engage more actively, teachers teach more effectively, and learning becomes meaningful rather than mechanical.
ALSO READ:
KUCCPS opens KMTC applications portal for KCSE 2024 or earlier candidates
Cost efficiency is another compelling reason to decentralize book procurement. Local sourcing allows school heads to compare prices, negotiate competitively, and avoid unnecessary middlemen or extra logistical costs associated with centralized bulk orders. Funds allocated for learning materials are more likely to directly benefit students rather than being absorbed by administrative overheads. Additionally, engaging local suppliers stimulates the economy, creating a mutually beneficial cycle where schools are resourced, and communities thrive.
Decentralized procurement also encourages innovation and curriculum adaptability. Education is dynamic, and learning materials must keep pace with teaching methods, learner needs, and emerging trends. Heads of institutions, working closely with teachers, can introduce supplementary materials, practical guides, and reference books that enrich the classroom experience.
Teachers feel more involved, engaged, and invested in the learning process when they have a say in the selection of resources. Learners benefit from materials that are relevant, engaging, and practical, going beyond standard textbooks to foster critical thinking, creativity, and applied skills.
Equally important is the matter of accountability and ownership. Centralized procurement can create a situation where no single individual is directly responsible for delays, shortages, or substandard materials. By placing procurement authority in the hands of heads of institutions, responsibility becomes clear.
Principals oversee the use of funds, ensure timely delivery, and guarantee the quality of materials. Transparency is further enhanced when parents and community stakeholders are engaged in the procurement process. Concerns about favoritism or misuse of funds can be mitigated through clear procurement guidelines, proper training for school leaders, and periodic audits, creating a system of responsible autonomy.
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Education must focus on policy, curriculum oversight, and assessment. These are strategic, system-wide functions that impact the education sector as a whole. The Ministry’s role should be to develop policies that guide teaching and learning, ensure equity across regions, monitor curriculum implementation, and oversee examinations and learner assessments. This division of responsibilities ensures that schools have the operational flexibility to meet local needs while the Ministry safeguards standards, quality, and accountability at the national level.
ALSO READ:
Stakeholders call for revert to former school-based admission system on Grade 10 placement
Policy and assessment are central to educational success. By focusing on these areas, the Ministry can track performance, identify systemic challenges, and intervene where necessary to maintain equity and quality.
Centralized book procurement, by contrast, often ties up Ministry resources in administrative functions that could be better spent on curriculum development, teacher training, and assessment innovations. Decentralizing procurement allows the Ministry to perform its core functions more effectively while giving schools the autonomy they need to respond to learners’ immediate requirements.
Globally, education systems that decentralize operational decisions while centralizing oversight often perform better. Heads of institutions, closest to the learners, can make informed, context-specific decisions. Ministries, focusing on standards, curriculum, and assessment, maintain consistency, fairness, and quality across the board. This balance respects local realities while ensuring national objectives are met.
Empowering school heads also strengthens leadership and professional integrity. When principals are trusted to manage resources, it reinforces their expertise and decision-making authority. Confident, competent leadership fosters better teacher motivation, cohesion among staff, and a culture of professionalism in schools. Motivated, well-supported teachers are better equipped to inspire learners, creating a virtuous cycle where leadership, teaching, and learning reinforce one another.
Moreover, learners benefit directly from this shift. Education is not merely about completing a syllabus; it is about acquiring knowledge, skills, and competencies that prepare young people for life beyond the classroom. Delays in resources or the provision of inadequate materials can hinder understanding, limit engagement, and reduce performance. When heads of institutions control procurement, they can ensure that learners receive the right books at the right time, enabling a learning environment that is responsive, effective, and learner-centered.
ALSO READ:
Bomet’s Konoin residents rally behind proposal for KMTC campus to improve healthcare delivery
It is also important to recognize that decentralization is not about removing oversight. Checks and balances are essential. Establishing clear procurement policies, training heads on ethical and efficient sourcing, and conducting regular audits ensures that autonomy is exercised responsibly. This combination of freedom and oversight creates a system where schools are empowered to meet their unique needs without compromising integrity, transparency, or quality.
In conclusion, the benefits of allowing heads of institutions to source books directly are clear: it ensures timeliness, quality, relevance, cost efficiency, and innovation, while strengthening accountability and professional ownership. Simultaneously, the Ministry of Education must dedicate its energy to policy formulation, curriculum oversight, and assessment, safeguarding national standards and equity. This division of responsibilities creates a responsive, efficient, and learner-focused education system.
Empowering school heads is not simply an administrative reform; it is an investment in Kenya’s future. When schools have the authority to select learning resources tailored to their learners’ needs, education becomes more relevant, engaging, and impactful. Learners gain access to high-quality materials on time, teachers are motivated and involved, and schools operate with transparency and accountability. Meanwhile, the Ministry focuses on strategic oversight, ensuring that national education goals are met and standards are maintained.
Kenya’s education system cannot afford to remain bogged down by outdated centralized procedures that fail to meet the demands of learners and teachers. The time has come to trust school heads to lead where they are most capable: in sourcing books and managing learning materials. This approach strengthens the system, prioritizes learners, and ensures that education delivers on its promise of opportunity, excellence, and progress for every child.
By Hillary Muhalya
You can also follow our social media pages on Twitter: Education News KE and Facebook: Education News Newspaper for timely updates.
>>> Click here to stay up-to-date with trending regional stories
>>> Click here to read more informed opinions on the country’s education landscape
